Files
Fuchs_Intranet/Fuchs/Docs/Decisions
Stefan c741535aec
Playwright Tests / test (push) Canceled after 0s
feat: Implement mfr truncation fix and enhance invoice handling
- Added a new SQL script to address the "String or binary data would be truncated" error in mfr sync by widening the Note fields in service objects and companies to NVARCHAR(MAX).
- Updated the table types and associated stored procedures to accommodate the changes, ensuring compatibility with existing data.
- Queued a re-sync for previously rejected rows due to truncation issues.
- Created application logins for fuchs_fds and fuchs_web with placeholder passwords for initial setup.
- Introduced functions for invoice backdating and invoice date retrieval to streamline invoice processing.
- Developed a password generation function with customizable parameters for length and character types.
- Added a random number generation function to support password creation.
2026-09-30 16:56:08 +02:00
..

Decisions

This folder holds Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) — short, immutable records of a specific technical choice, why it was made, and what it implies going forward.

What belongs here

A decision, not a how-to. If it answers "why do we do X this way, and what else did we consider," it's a decision. If it explains "how subsystem X currently works," that belongs in ../Concepts instead (and a decision often triggers a concept doc to be created/updated).

File naming

NNNN-kebab-case-title.md, four-digit zero-padded, sequential across the whole folder (0001-..., 0002-...). Never reuse or renumber.

Required YAML frontmatter

Every decision file starts with:

---
status: Accepted        # Proposed | Accepted | Superseded
date: 2026-07-03         # date the decision was accepted
applyTo:                 # glob(s) — files/areas this decision governs
  - "Fuchs/Notifications/**"
supersededBy: ""         # filename of the decision that replaced this one, if any
---

Agents (Claude, Copilot, Codex) must scan the YAML frontmatter of every file in this folder first (cheap — no need to read the body) and only read the full body of decisions whose applyTo glob matches the files they're about to touch, or whose subject is otherwise clearly relevant to the task. This keeps decision-following cheap even as the folder grows.

Body template

# NNNN — Title

## Context
What problem/situation forced a choice.

## Decision
What was decided, stated plainly.

## Consequences
What this implies for future code — constraints, follow-ups, trade-offs
accepted knowingly.

## Alternatives considered
Options that were rejected and why (optional but preferred).

Rules

  • Decisions are immutable once Accepted. Do not edit the Decision/ Consequences of an existing file to reverse it. Instead, write a new decision, set its applyTo/subject accordingly, and set the old file's status: Superseded + supersededBy: NNNN-new-file.md.
  • Follow existing decisions. Before implementing anything in an area covered by an Accepted decision, read it and conform to it. If you believe a decision is wrong, raise it with the user rather than silently deviating.
  • Capture new decisions as they happen. Whenever the user (or the code you're writing) settles a non-obvious architectural or cross-cutting choice — not a routine implementation detail — add a decision here in the same change, and create/update the matching concept doc in ../Concepts.