Files
Fuchs_Intranet/Fuchs/Docs/Decisions
StefanandClaude Sonnet 5 076290cbeb
Playwright Tests / test (push) Canceled after 0s
Split Admin module into Status and User Management under one sidemenu dropdown
Splits fn=admin into two independent modules: the original status
dashboard stays at fn=admin, user management moves to a new fn=usr
(IntranetController.AdminUsers.cs, fis.usr.js). Both are now reached
through a single "Administration" sidemenu dropdown (Systemüberwachung /
Benutzerverwaltung) gated by one shared fds_sys > 4 check, per ADR 0015
(supersedes 0014's "fold into one module" choice).

Also fixes the password-reset validation to check only a plain 6-char
minimum instead of silently also requiring ValidatePassword's default
2-uppercase/2-lowercase/2-digit composition, which contradicted the
"mind. 6 Zeichen" message shown to the admin.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-09-09 12:09:44 +02:00
..

Decisions

This folder holds Architecture Decision Records (ADRs) — short, immutable records of a specific technical choice, why it was made, and what it implies going forward.

What belongs here

A decision, not a how-to. If it answers "why do we do X this way, and what else did we consider," it's a decision. If it explains "how subsystem X currently works," that belongs in ../Concepts instead (and a decision often triggers a concept doc to be created/updated).

File naming

NNNN-kebab-case-title.md, four-digit zero-padded, sequential across the whole folder (0001-..., 0002-...). Never reuse or renumber.

Required YAML frontmatter

Every decision file starts with:

---
status: Accepted        # Proposed | Accepted | Superseded
date: 2026-07-03         # date the decision was accepted
applyTo:                 # glob(s) — files/areas this decision governs
  - "Fuchs/Notifications/**"
supersededBy: ""         # filename of the decision that replaced this one, if any
---

Agents (Claude, Copilot, Codex) must scan the YAML frontmatter of every file in this folder first (cheap — no need to read the body) and only read the full body of decisions whose applyTo glob matches the files they're about to touch, or whose subject is otherwise clearly relevant to the task. This keeps decision-following cheap even as the folder grows.

Body template

# NNNN — Title

## Context
What problem/situation forced a choice.

## Decision
What was decided, stated plainly.

## Consequences
What this implies for future code — constraints, follow-ups, trade-offs
accepted knowingly.

## Alternatives considered
Options that were rejected and why (optional but preferred).

Rules

  • Decisions are immutable once Accepted. Do not edit the Decision/ Consequences of an existing file to reverse it. Instead, write a new decision, set its applyTo/subject accordingly, and set the old file's status: Superseded + supersededBy: NNNN-new-file.md.
  • Follow existing decisions. Before implementing anything in an area covered by an Accepted decision, read it and conform to it. If you believe a decision is wrong, raise it with the user rather than silently deviating.
  • Capture new decisions as they happen. Whenever the user (or the code you're writing) settles a non-obvious architectural or cross-cutting choice — not a routine implementation detail — add a decision here in the same change, and create/update the matching concept doc in ../Concepts.